Apple's hypocrisy over iPhone water resistance claim is challenged in court

Unless cell phone manufacturers include water damage in their warranties, you can assume there's always a chance that water will get into your device and damage it. However, like most other cell phone manufacturers, Apple claims that their phones will survive submersion in clear water up to a certain depth for a certain amount of time and emerge from the water in perfect condition.

The plaintiff's iPhone stopped working immediately after it came into contact with water near a pool

The case, which attorney Joey Zukran is seeking to convert into a class action lawsuit, involves a 19-year-old college student who was in Mexico when her iPhone got wet near a pool. Zukran said the iPhone, which she bought brand new eight months ago, immediately stopped working. His client took the damaged phone to the Genius Bar at an Apple Store and was told it could not be repaired because the device had been exposed to water.

Zukran, who works for the law firm LPC Avocats, wants Apple to remove the part of its warranty that excludes water damage. He also wants Apple to compensate those who had to pay to repair their water-damaged iPhone or buy a new device, and to pay class members an additional $500 each.

The lawyer had already won a victory against Apple and the iPhone in 2018. Zukran and another lawyer had successfully sued Apple over a warranty issue related to the iPhone battery. The original ruling against Apple was upheld by the Quebec Court of Appeal in 2021.

In 2022, a U.S. district judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Apple of misrepresenting the iPhone's water resistance

In February 2022, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote dismissed a U.S. lawsuit accusing Apple of “false and misleading” misrepresentations about the iPhone's water resistance (sound familiar?). The judge said it was plausible to believe that Apple's advertising could mislead consumers into believing that the iPhones they purchased were protected against water ingress. However, the judge ruled that the plaintiffs did not provide evidence that their phones were damaged by “contact with liquid.” The plaintiffs also had no evidence that Apple intended to misrepresent the iPhone's water resistance claims.
In 2020, Apple was fined the equivalent of $12 million by an Italian agency. It found that the company had made claims about the iPhone's water resistance without mentioning that the numbers Apple quoted were only valid under ideal lab conditions. The agency claimed that in real-world use, the iPhone models it tested couldn't come anywhere close to the claims the company made. Another part of the lawsuit that sounds pretty familiar accused Apple of using its water resistance claims to sell iPhone models but refusing to offer warranty service for devices damaged by water damage.

It might take a landmark legal defeat against Apple or another major smartphone maker to get them to include water damage in the warranty when you buy a new phone. Such a ruling could have a major impact on the entire industry, since in most cases consumers are held responsible for water getting into their phones, regardless of what the manufacturer says in advertising about water resistance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *